diff options
author | Daniel Stenberg <daniel@haxx.se> | 2004-09-19 22:37:26 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Daniel Stenberg <daniel@haxx.se> | 2004-09-19 22:37:26 +0000 |
commit | 543ab6f331e9f3f93204cd8e46ccb4cc604b8912 (patch) | |
tree | f12b25c90ee79ce73d37157389fdf9d90f3a760c | |
parent | 2b6f7ef2a9146c1701ac140171a1b41b0fbb8b02 (diff) |
added URL to the exception paragraph in the GPL FAQ
-rw-r--r-- | docs/LICENSE-MIXING | 13 |
1 files changed, 8 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/docs/LICENSE-MIXING b/docs/LICENSE-MIXING index 375f17aea..9321f2f77 100644 --- a/docs/LICENSE-MIXING +++ b/docs/LICENSE-MIXING @@ -10,13 +10,14 @@ can lead to for end users. I am not a lawyer and this is not legal advice! -One common dilemma is that GPL[*]-licensed code is not allowed to be linked +One common dilemma is that GPL[1]-licensed code is not allowed to be linked with code licensed under the Original BSD license (with the announcement clause, unless there's a specified exception in the GPL-licensed module). You may still build your own copies that use them all, but distributing them as -binaries would be to violate the GPL license. This particular problem was -addressed when the Modified BSD license was created, which does not have the -annoncement clause that collides with GPL. +binaries would be to violate the GPL license - unless you accompany your +license with an exception[2]. This particular problem was addressed when the +Modified BSD license was created, which does not have the annoncement clause +that collides with GPL. libcurl http://curl.haxx.se/docs/copyright.html @@ -80,4 +81,6 @@ OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/software/release/license.html linked with libcurl in an app. -[*] = GPL - GNU General Public License: http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html +[1] = GPL - GNU General Public License: http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html +[2] = http://www.fsf.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#GPLIncompatibleLibs details on + how to write such an exception to the GPL |