diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'docs/SECURITY-PROCESS.md')
-rw-r--r-- | docs/SECURITY-PROCESS.md | 116 |
1 files changed, 116 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/docs/SECURITY-PROCESS.md b/docs/SECURITY-PROCESS.md new file mode 100644 index 000000000..d39c5a1fb --- /dev/null +++ b/docs/SECURITY-PROCESS.md @@ -0,0 +1,116 @@ +curl security process +===================== + +This document describes how security vulnerabilities should be handled in the +curl project. + +Publishing Information +---------------------- + +All known and public curl or libcurl related vulnerabilities are listed on +[the curl web site security page](https://curl.haxx.se/docs/security.html). + +Security vulnerabilities should not be entered in the project's public bug +tracker unless the necessary configuration is in place to limit access to the +issue to only the reporter and the project's security team. + +Vulnerability Handling +---------------------- + +The typical process for handling a new security vulnerability is as follows. + +No information should be made public about a vulnerability until it is +formally announced at the end of this process. That means, for example that a +bug tracker entry must NOT be created to track the issue since that will make +the issue public and it should not be discussed on any of the project's public +mailing lists. Also messages associated with any commits should not make +any reference to the security nature of the commit if done prior to the public +announcement. + +- The person discovering the issue, the reporter, reports the vulnerability + privately to `curl-security@haxx.se`. That's an email alias that reaches a + handful of selected and trusted people. + +- Messages that do not relate to the reporting or managing of an undisclosed + security vulnerability in curl or libcurl are ignored and no further action + is required. + +- A person in the security team sends an e-mail to the original reporter to + acknowledge the report. + +- The security team investigates the report and either rejects it or accepts + it. + +- If the report is rejected, the team writes to the reporter to explain why. + +- If the report is accepted, the team writes to the reporter to let him/her + know it is accepted and that they are working on a fix. + +- The security team discusses the problem, works out a fix, considers the + impact of the problem and suggests a release schedule. This discussion + should involve the reporter as much as possible. + +- The release of the information should be "as soon as possible" and is most + often synced with an upcoming release that contains the fix. If the + reporter, or anyone else, thinks the next planned release is too far away + then a separate earlier release for security reasons should be considered. + +- Write a security advisory draft about the problem that explains what the + problem is, its impact, which versions it affects, solutions or + workarounds, when the release is out and make sure to credit all + contributors properly. + +- Request a CVE number from + [distros@openwall](http://oss-security.openwall.org/wiki/mailing-lists/distros) + when also informing and preparing them for the upcoming public security + vulnerability announcement - attach the advisory draft for information. Note + that 'distros' won't accept an embargo longer than 14 days and they do not + care for Windows-specific flaws. For windows-specific flaws, request CVE + directly from MITRE. + +- Update the "security advisory" with the CVE number. + +- The security team commits the fix in a private branch. The commit message + should ideally contain the CVE number. This fix is usually also distributed + to the 'distros' mailing list to allow them to use the fix prior to the + public announcement. + +- No more than 48 hours before the release, the private branch is merged into + the master branch and pushed. Once pushed, the information is accessible to + the public and the actual release should follow suit immediately afterwards. + The time between the push and the release is used for final tests and + reviews. + +- The project team creates a release that includes the fix. + +- The project team announces the release and the vulnerability to the world in + the same manner we always announce releases. It gets sent to the + curl-announce, curl-library and curl-users mailing lists. + +- The security web page on the web site should get the new vulnerability + mentioned. + +Pre-notification +---------------- + +If you think you are or should be eligible for a pre-notification about +upcoming security announcements for curl, we urge OS distros and similar +vendors to primarily join the distros@openwall list as that is one of the +purposes of that list - and not just for curl of course. + +If you are not a distro or otherwise not suitable for distros@openwall and yet +want pre-notifications from us, contact the curl security team with a detailed +and clear explanation why this is the case. + +curl-security (at haxx dot se) +------------------------------ + +Who is on this list? There are a couple of criteria you must meet, and then we +might ask you to join the list or you can ask to join it. It really isn't very +formal. We basically only require that you have a long-term presence in the +curl project and you have shown an understanding for the project and its way +of working. You must've been around for a good while and you should have no +plans in vanishing in the near future. + +We do not make the list of participants public mostly because it tends to vary +somewhat over time and a list somewhere will only risk getting outdated. |