Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
This reverts commit 3773de378d48b06c09931e44dca4d274d0bfdce0.
Regression shipped in 7.64.0
Fixes #3649
|
|
|
|
Follow-up to 8eddb8f4259.
If the cookieinfo pointer is NULL there really is nothing to save.
Without this fix, we got a problem when a handle was using shared object
with cookies and is told to "FLUSH" it to file (which worked) and then
the share object was removed and when the easy handle was closed just
afterwards it has no cookieinfo and no cookies so it decided to save an
empty jar (overwriting the file just flushed).
Test 1905 now verifies that this works.
Assisted-by: Michael Wallner
Assisted-by: Marcel Raad
Closes #3621
|
|
Regression brought by a52e46f3900fb0 (shipped in 7.63.0)
Closes #3613
|
|
The draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-02 draft, specify a set of prefixes
and how they should affect cookie initialization, which has been
adopted by the major browsers. This adds support for the two prefixes
defined, __Host- and __Secure, and updates the testcase with the
supplied examples from the draft.
Closes #3554
Reviewed-by: Daniel Stenberg <daniel@haxx.se>
|
|
Closes #3469
|
|
Added test 1562 to verify.
Reported-by: Jeroen Ooms
Fixes #3445
Closes #3450
|
|
Ensure to perform the checks we have to enforce a sane domain in
the cookie request. The check for non-PSL enabled builds is quite
basic but it's better than nothing.
Closes #2964
Reviewed-by: Daniel Stenberg <daniel@haxx.se>
|
|
Only allow secure origins to be able to write cookies with the
'secure' flag set. This reduces the risk of non-secure origins
to influence the state of secure origins. This implements IETF
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-httpbis-cookie-alone-01 which updates
RFC6265.
Closes #2956
Reviewed-by: Daniel Stenberg <daniel@haxx.se>
|
|
Reported-by: Jeroen Ooms
Fixes #3351
Closes #3352
|
|
Important for when the file is going to be read again and thus must not
contain old contents!
Adds test 327 to verify.
Reported-by: daboul on github
Fixes #3299
Closes #3300
|
|
Rather than jumping backwards to where failure cleanup happens
to be performed, move the failure case to end of the function
where it is expected per existing coding convention.
Closes #2965
|
|
If the formatting fails, we error out on a fatal error and
clean up on the way out. The array was however freed within
the wrong scope and was thus never freed in case the cookies
were written to a file instead of STDOUT.
Closes #2957
|
|
Expired cookies have already been purged at a later expiration time
before this check, so remove the redundant check.
closes #2962
|
|
Assisted-by: Rikard Falkeborn
Closes #2922
|
|
According to RFC6265 section 5.4, cookies with equal path lengths
SHOULD be sorted by creation-time (earlier first). This adds a
creation-time record to the cookie struct in order to make cookie
sorting more deterministic. The creation-time is defined as the
order of the cookies in the jar, the first cookie read fro the
jar being the oldest. The creation-time is thus not serialized
into the jar. Also remove the strcmp() matching in the sorting as
there is no lexicographic ordering in RFC6265. Existing tests are
updated to match.
Closes #2524
|
|
- Get rid of variable that was generating false positive warning
(unitialized)
- Fix issues in tests
- Reduce scope of several variables all over
etc
Closes #2631
|
|
Closes #2623
|
|
The latest psl is cached in the multi or share handle. It is refreshed
before use after 72 hours.
New share lock CURL_LOCK_DATA_PSL controls the psl cache sharing.
If the latest psl is not available, the builtin psl is used.
Reported-by: Yaakov Selkowitz
Fixes #2553
Closes #2601
|
|
RFC 6265 section 4.2.1 does not set restrictions on cookie names.
This is a follow-up to commit 7f7fcd0.
Also explicitly check proper syntax of cookie name/value pair.
New test 1155 checks that cookie names are not reserved words.
Reported-By: anshnd at github
Fixes #2564
Closes #2566
|
|
The jar should be written iff there are cookies, so ensure that we still
have cookies after expiration to avoid creating an empty file.
Closes #2529
|
|
... since they return size_t anyway!
closes #2462
|
|
closes #2458
|
|
This fixes a segfault occurring when a name of the (invalid) form "domain..tld"
is processed.
test46 updated to cover this case.
Follow-up to commit c990ead.
Ref: https://github.com/curl/curl/pull/2440
|
|
This makes libcurl handle thousands of cookies much better and speedier.
Closes #2440
|
|
This drops the cookie load time for 8k cookies from 178ms to 15ms.
Closes #2441
|
|
It was once used for some debugging/verifying logic but should never have
ended up in git!
|
|
... when expiring old cookies.
Reported-by: Pavel Gushchin
Fixes #2032
Closes #2035
|
|
... this will let the second occurance override the first.
Added test 1161 to verify.
Reported-by: Max Dymond
Fixes #1932
Closes #1933
|
|
Regression brought by 2bc230de63b
Detected by OSS-fuzz: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=3513
Assisted-by: Max Dymond
Closes #1930
|
|
Closes #1896
|
|
... instead of truncating them.
There's no fixed limit for acceptable cookie names in RFC 6265, but the
entire cookie is said to be less than 4096 bytes (section 6.1). This is
also what browsers seem to implement.
We now allow max 5000 bytes cookie header. Max 4095 bytes length per
cookie name and value. Name + value together may not exceed 4096 bytes.
Added test 1151 to verify
Bug: https://curl.haxx.se/mail/lib-2017-09/0062.html
Reported-by: Kevin Smith
Closes #1894
|
|
|
|
|
|
... make sure we bail out on overflows.
Reported-by: Brian Carpenter
Closes #1758
|
|
... by removing the else branch after a return, break or continue.
Closes #1310
|
|
|
|
This repairs cookies for localhost.
Non-PSL builds will now only accept "localhost" without dots, while PSL
builds okeys everything not listed as PSL.
Added test 1258 to verify.
This was a regression brought in a76825a5efa6b4
|
|
... they're already frowned upon in our source code style guide, this
now enforces the rule harder.
|
|
|
|
... that will ignore lines that are too long to fit in the buffer.
CVE-2016-8615
Bug: https://curl.haxx.se/docs/adv_20161102A.html
Reported-by: Cure53
|
|
We had some confusions on when each function was used. We should not act
differently on different locales anyway.
|
|
... to make it less likely that we forget that the function actually
does case insentive compares. Also replaced several invokes of the
function with a plain strcmp when case sensitivity is not an issue (like
comparing with "-").
|
|
Previously it only held references to them, which was reckless as the
thread lock was released so the cookies could get modified by other
handles that share the same cookie jar over the share interface.
CVE-2016-8623
Bug: https://curl.haxx.se/docs/adv_20161102I.html
Reported-by: Cure53
|
|
Cokie with the same domain but different tailmatching property are now
considered different and do not replace each other. If header contains
following lines then two cookies will be set: Set-Cookie: foo=bar;
domain=.foo.com; expires=Thu Mar 3 GMT 8:56:27 2033 Set-Cookie: foo=baz;
domain=foo.com; expires=Thu Mar 3 GMT 8:56:27 2033
This matches Chrome, Opera, Safari, and Firefox behavior. When sending
stored tokens to foo.com Chrome, Opera, Firefox store send them in the
stored order, while Safari pre-sort the cookies.
Closes #1050
|
|
Closes https://github.com/curl/curl/pull/911
|
|
|
|
curl_printf.h defines printf to curl_mprintf, etc. This can cause
problems with external headers which may use
__attribute__((format(printf, ...))) markers etc.
To avoid that they cause problems with system includes, we include
curl_printf.h after any system headers. That makes the three last
headers to always be, and we keep them in this order:
curl_printf.h
curl_memory.h
memdebug.h
None of them include system headers, they all do funny #defines.
Reported-by: David Benjamin
Fixes #743
|
|
RFC 6265 section 4.1.1 spells out that the first name/value pair in the
header is the actual cookie name and content, while the following are
the parameters.
libcurl previously had a more liberal approach which causes significant
problems when introducing new cookie parameters, like the suggested new
cookie priority draft.
The previous logic read all n/v pairs from left-to-right and the first
name used that wassn't a known parameter name would be used as the
cookie name, thus accepting "Set-Cookie: Max-Age=2; person=daniel" to be
a cookie named 'person' while an RFC 6265 compliant parser should
consider that to be a cookie named 'Max-Age' with an (unknown) parameter
'person'.
Fixes #709
|
|
Closes #658
|