1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
|
---
title: How the Dewey Decimal Classification Works
---
The Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) is widely used in libraries to organize
their collections. I think a lot of people have probably used the DDC to find a
book in a library, and a lot of people generally know how it works: number
ranges correspond to high-level topics, with more numbers in the middle to fill
in more specific subjects. You might be familiar with the table of main classes:
<table>
<tr>
<td>000</td>
<td>Computers and general information</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>100</td>
<td>Philosophy and Psychology</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>200</td>
<td>Religion</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>300</td>
<td>Social Sciences</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>400</td>
<td>Language</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>500</td>
<td>Math and Science</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>600</td>
<td>Technology</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>700</td>
<td>Art</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>800</td>
<td>Literature</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>900</td>
<td>History and Geography</td>
</tr>
</table>
I've always been interested in how the rest of the digits were decided on, so I
decided to learn more! Surprisingly, it's a bit challenging to find references
on the DDC because it's actually sort of a proprietary system. It's managed and
published by the Online Computer Library Center (OCLC), and they're quite happy
to sell you the DDC or access to WebDewey for many hundreds of dollars.
After some further digging, I came across an [online class on the Dewey Decimal
Classification][class] from the Nebraska Library Commission. It's three sessions
of about an hour each. And now I know a lot more about how the DDC works!
<!--more-->
The DDC was created in the 1870s by Melvil Dewey, who [was a problematic
person][dewey], and as a result the DDC has [its share of issues][crit]. For
these reasons and others, many libraries are moving away from the DDC to other
systems such as the [Library of Congress classification system][loc] or the
[BISAC subject codes][bisac] used by many booksellers. Though it might be in
decline, it's widely-enough used that I still wanted to learn more about it.
The DDC organizes works into one of the ten main classes shown above. Each class
has ten divisions (the second digit), and each division has ten sections (the
third digit). There are further subdivisions that can be applied for more
specific works. Overall, this forms a tree structure in which each subsequent
digit traverses down the tree to a more specific topic. Works are classified
into the node which is as specific as possible, so in general a shorter number
or a number with fewer non-zero terminal digits will refer to a work that covers
a broader range of topics.
In order to properly class works, there are two primary variables to consider:
the subject/topic and the discipline. For example, you might class a work on
dogs either in 599.77 (Natural sciences and mathematics > Animals > Mammals >
Carnivores > Dog Family), or in 636.7 (Technology > Argiculture and related
technologies > Animal husbandry > Dogs), depending on whether it was a book
about the physiology of dogs or on keeping dogs as pets.
Of course, sometimes a work covers multiple topics or even multiple disciplines.
The DDC has rules which dictate how these situations should be handled. (To
continue the dog example, if you look in 599.77, there is a note which says
"class interdisciplinary works on dogs in 636.7," so if a work covered both the
biology and raising of dogs, it should be classed in 636.7).
If you were to buy a hard copy of the DDC, you'd notice that there are a few
different parts. The main part that people think of as the DDC is called the
"schedules." This is the big list of all the top-level numbers, arranged into
chapters for each main class. There's also an introduction, which has rules for
deciding where works should be classed. For example the rule of fuller treatment
says that if a work covers two or more topics, but covers one topic more fully
than all the others, the work should be classed under that topic. There's also
the rule of two, which states that if a work covers two topics fairly equally,
it should be classed under the lower number. For example, a work on with equal
treatment of French bulldogs (636.72) and Welsh corgis (636.737) should be
classed under the lower number, 636.72.
In addition to the introduction and the schedules, there's also the manual which
helps you resolve some specific situations (usually you'll see a note in the
schedules like "See manual 636.72-636.75" that points you to go there), the
relative index, and the tables. The relative index is generally the starting
point for classifying a work. You can look up a topic alphabetically, and you'll
be pointed to all the different possible classifications. And finally, the
tables, which help classify works more specifically.
This introduces a topic called "number building." The DDC doesn't actually
contain a specific entry for each possible topic, but relies on adding standard
subdivisions to numbers listed in the schedules. Table 1 contains the standard
subdivisions, which you can add as a suffix to pretty much any number you find
in the schedules. The standard subdivisions include:
<table>
<tr>
<td>—01</td>
<td>Philosophy and theory</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>—02</td>
<td>Miscellany</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>—03</td>
<td>Dictionaries, encyclopedias, concordances</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>—04</td>
<td>Special topics</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>—05</td>
<td>Serial publications</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>—06</td>
<td>Organizations and management</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>—07</td>
<td>Education, research, and related topics</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>—08</td>
<td>Groups of people</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>—09</td>
<td>History, geographic treatment, biography</td>
</tr>
</table>
For example, an encyclopedia of programming languages could be classed under
<strong>005</strong>
(Computer programming, programs, data), <strong>.1</strong> (programming),
<strong>3</strong> (programming languages), <strong>—03</strong>
(Dictionaries, encyclopedias, concordances) to yield the number 005.1303. The
book <em>Cracking the Coding Interview</em>, which is about the job of
programming , could be classed under 005.1023, again using 005.1 (programming)
and adding —023, the standard subdivision for "the subject as a
profession, occupation, hobby."
There are four tables in total; table 2 is used in conjunction with the 09
standard subdivision from table 1, e.g. a book about the architecture of Boston
might be classed under 720.9744, with 720 being the architecture, 09 being the
standard subdivision for geographic treatment, and 744 being the suffix from
table 2 for Massachusetts. You might expect the number to be 720.09744, and it
would be, except that in the schedules under 720, we are instructed to put the
standard subdivisions in .1 through .9.
Table 3 contains subdivisions for literatures and literary forms and is only
used with the main class 800 Literature. For example, a collection of American
plays might be classed as 81 (American literature in English) + 3 (the
subdivision from table 3 for Drama) to get 813 as the result.
Finally, table 4 contains subdivisions for languages, and is only used with the
400 Language main class. It's used to break down specific attributes of
language, such as —3 for dictionaries. So Webster's dictionary would be
classed as <strong>420</strong> (English and Old English) + <strong>3</strong>
(dictionaries) = <strong>423</strong>.
There's a lot to the system, and while there is still a lot I don't know, I now
know a lot more about how it works than I did previously! If I got something
wrong here, please email me about it! I'd love to learn more.
[class]: http://nlc.nebraska.gov/handouts/classmaterials/ddcsummer2014/dewey.html
[dewey]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Melvil_Dewey#Controversies
[crit]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dewey_Decimal_Classification#Influence_and_criticism
[bisac]: https://bisg.org/page/BISACSubjectCodes
[loc]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Library_of_Congress_Classification
|
