diff options
| author | Viktor Szakats <vszakats@users.noreply.github.com> | 2015-06-16 00:47:26 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Daniel Stenberg <daniel@haxx.se> | 2015-06-16 09:08:00 +0200 |
| commit | 45f21e0f3761ef94a1da210688d3d14beb0fcd2b (patch) | |
| tree | 159e56b33c4aabdc38ec681d24e540e1230bf6dc /docs/DISTRO-DILEMMA | |
| parent | f93da27756716b448de335cc7f29fe3702acbf76 (diff) | |
docs: update URLs
Diffstat (limited to 'docs/DISTRO-DILEMMA')
| -rw-r--r-- | docs/DISTRO-DILEMMA | 14 |
1 files changed, 7 insertions, 7 deletions
diff --git a/docs/DISTRO-DILEMMA b/docs/DISTRO-DILEMMA index 71186a268..2d317fdb0 100644 --- a/docs/DISTRO-DILEMMA +++ b/docs/DISTRO-DILEMMA @@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ The Better License, Original BSD, GPL or LGPL? In Debian land, there seems to be a common opinion that LGPL is "maximally compatible" with apps while Original BSD is not. Like this: - http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/09/msg01417.html + https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/09/msg01417.html More SSL Libraries @@ -163,13 +163,13 @@ Distro Angle of this Problem Footnotes [1] = http://www.xfree86.org/3.3.6/COPYRIGHT2.html#6 - [2] = http://www.fsf.org/licensing/essays/bsd.html - [3] = http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/gpl.html + [2] = https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/bsd.html + [3] = https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html [4] = http://curl.haxx.se/docs/copyright.html - [5] = http://www.openssl.org/source/license.html - [6] = http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/gpl.html end of section 3 - [7] = http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/lgpl.html - [8] = http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenSSL_exception + [5] = https://www.openssl.org/source/license.html + [6] = https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html end of section 3 + [7] = https://www.gnu.org/licenses/lgpl.html + [8] = https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenSSL_exception Feedback/Updates provided by |