diff options
-rw-r--r-- | docs/TODO | 22 |
1 files changed, 11 insertions, 11 deletions
@@ -36,7 +36,6 @@ 1.18 try next proxy if one doesn't work 1.19 Timeout idle connections from the pool 1.20 SRV and URI DNS records - 1.21 QUIC 1.22 Monitor connections in the connection pool 1.23 Offer API to flush the connection pool @@ -68,6 +67,7 @@ 5.5 auth= in URLs 5.6 Refuse "downgrade" redirects 5.7 Brotli compression + 5.8 QUIC 6. TELNET 6.1 ditch stdin @@ -353,16 +353,6 @@ Offer support for resolving SRV and URI DNS records for libcurl to know which server to connect to for various protocols (including HTTP!). -1.21 QUIC - - The standardization process of QUIC has been taken to the IETF and can be - followed on the [IETF QUIC Mailing - list](https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic). I'd like us to get on the - bandwagon. Ideally, this would be done with a separate library/project to - handle the binary/framing layer in a similar fashion to how HTTP/2 is - implemented. This, to allow other projects to benefit from the work and to - thus broaden the interest and chance of others to participate. - 1.22 Monitor connections in the connection pool If the server sends HTTP/2 frames (like for example an HTTP/2 PING frame) to @@ -546,6 +536,16 @@ This is not detailed in any FTP specification. of this. The algorithm: https://github.com/google/brotli The Firefox bug: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=366559 +5.8 QUIC + + The standardization process of QUIC has been taken to the IETF and can be + followed on the [IETF QUIC Mailing + list](https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic). I'd like us to get on the + bandwagon. Ideally, this would be done with a separate library/project to + handle the binary/framing layer in a similar fashion to how HTTP/2 is + implemented. This, to allow other projects to benefit from the work and to + thus broaden the interest and chance of others to participate. + 6. TELNET |