diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'docs/SECURITY')
-rw-r--r-- | docs/SECURITY | 91 |
1 files changed, 91 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/docs/SECURITY b/docs/SECURITY new file mode 100644 index 000000000..01c9668ed --- /dev/null +++ b/docs/SECURITY @@ -0,0 +1,91 @@ + _ _ ____ _ + ___| | | | _ \| | + / __| | | | |_) | | + | (__| |_| | _ <| |___ + \___|\___/|_| \_\_____| + +CURL SECURITY FOR DEVELOPERS + +This document is intended to provide guidance to curl developers on how +security vulnerabilities should be handled. + +PUBLISHING INFORMATION + +All known and public curl or libcurl related vulnerabilities are listed at +http://curl.haxx.se/docs/security.html + +Security vulnerabilities should not be entered in the project's public bug +tracker unless the necessary configuration is in place to limit access to the +issue to only the reporter and the project's security team. + +VULNERABILITY HANDLING + +The typical process for handling a new security vulnerability is as follows. + +No information should be made public about a vulnerability until it is +formally announced at the end of this process. That means, for example that a +bug tracker entry must NOT be created to track the issue since that will make +the issue public and it should not be discussed on any of the project's public +mailing lists. Also messages associated with any commits should not make +any reference to the security nature of the commit if done prior to the public +announcement. + +- The person discovering the issue, the reporter, reports the vulnerability + privately to curl-security@haxx.se. That's an email alias that reaches a + handful of selected and trusted people. + +- Messages that do not relate to the reporting or managing of an undisclosed + security vulnerability in curl or libcurl are ignored and no further action + is required. + +- A person in the security team sends an e-mail to the original reporter to + acknowledge the report. + +- The security team investigates the report and either rejects it or accepts + it. + +- If the report is rejected, the team writes to the reporter to explain why. + +- If the report is accepted, the team writes to the reporter to let him/her + know it is accepted and that they are working on a fix. + +- The security team discusses the problem, works out a fix, considers the + impact of the problem and suggests a release schedule. This discussion + should involve the reporter as much as possible. + +- The release of the information should be "as soon as possible" and is most + often synced with an upcoming release that contains the fix. If the + reporter, or anyone else, thinks the next planned release is too far away + then a separate earlier release for security reasons should be considered. + +- Write a security advisory draft about the problem that explains what the + problem is, its impact, which versions it affects, solutions or + work-arounds, when the release is out and make sure to credit all + contributors properly. + +- Request a CVE number from distros@openwall.org[1] when also informing and + preparing them for the upcoming public security vulnerability announcement - + attach the advisory draft for information. Note that 'distros' won't accept + an embargo longer than 19 days. + +- Update the "security advisory" with the CVE number. + +- The security team commits the fix in a private branch. The commit message + should ideally contain the CVE number. This fix is usually also distributed + to the 'distros' mailing list to allow them to use the fix prior to the + public announcement. + +- At the day of the next release, the private branch is merged into the master + branch and pushed. Once pushed, the information is accessible to the public + and the actual release should follow suit immediately afterwards. + +- The project team creates a release that includes the fix. + +- The project team announces the release and the vulnerability to the world in + the same manner we always announce releases. It gets sent to the + curl-announce, curl-library and curl-users mailing lists. + +- The security web page on the web site should get the new vulernability + mentioned. + +[1] = http://oss-security.openwall.org/wiki/mailing-lists/distros |